1. Social withdrawal is encouraged when entering the MEIBC offices. Only issues in accordance with the directive are defined physically, unless the parties and the Council agree otherwise. 2. The Council or The Commissioner may, prior to the proceedings, contact the parties by telephone or other means to resolve the dispute. 3. The Council will hold preliminary votes. If the dispute is not subsequently resolved, conciliation is conducted by telephone or by any other means agreed or agreed upon by the parties. 4. If mediation cannot take place within 30 days of the date of removal and there is no agreement on an extension of the period, a certificate of result is issued by the Council`s Dispute Resolution Centre (CDR) 5. If the parties declare themselves ready to settle the dispute, the written transaction agreement will be sent electronically to both parties, as far as possible the most advanced provision of the membership company is probably the settlement of the LCIA which, in its recent incarnation, gives the arbitral tribunal the power, at the request of a party after giving the parties an appropriate opportunity. , to present its views and on the conditions (with respect to costs and otherwise) how the arbitral tribunal can rule.

Second, the problem arises when there are identical arbitration agreements in related contracts. This is also true if, at the time of the agreement, it did not really know the existence of the third party. Such jurisdiction of an arbitral tribunal must, of course, be considered contrary to the right of the seat, for example.B. Article 35 of the English Arbitration Act allows both third-party thought partners and the consolidation of arbitration procedures with the agreement of the parties. While in some cases, as for example. B the conclusion with an SPV, it can be said that a counterparty entered into the contract with eyes open, this is not always the case. There are other situations where the inability to call on third parties can lead to inefficiency and inconsistent decisions, unattractive to some users, but probably not to those who oppose such a Joinder. On the other hand, the model law remains silent on this subject, as does the 1958 New York Convention (NYC). NYC requires a „written agreement“ and Article V, paragraph 1, point (d), specifies the circumstances under which enforcement may be denied. Article 7 of the ICC rules stipulates that after the appointment of arbitrators, all parties, including the third party, must give their consent to the membership partner; although the ICC may join other parties before an arbitrator is appointed.